COMPLIANCE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR HCP ENGAGEMENT

Compliance decisions live in heads, inboxes, and Excel. Until now.

Advisory boards, market research, sponsorships, consulting, and whatever your teams run next. Verigage turns HCP engagements into one auditable system of record, with AI-assisted review your compliance team controls.

Built by a regulatory attorney and fractional CCO who does this job today.

How Verigage decides

Rules enforce. AI observes. Your reviewer decides.

Policy rules apply mechanically and identically, every time. The AI reads every submission and reports what the text contains and what it omits, quoting the submission itself, and never makes a decision. Your reviewer holds the authority, and every action lands in the record. Three layers, each doing the only job it should. This is the architecture built for an adversarial audit.

How a decision gets madeEvery engagement
Submission
Deterministic enforcement
FMV ranges, spend caps, frequency limits, required gates. Applied identically, every time.
AI observation
Reports what the submission contains and omits, quoting the text. Never decides.
Human decision
Approve, reject, or push back. Recorded with reasoning and full context.
Defensible record · hash-chained · exportable

Follow-through

Nothing outstanding stays outstanding

Verigage tracks every open item across every engagement: unsigned agreements, missing CVs, unpaid honoraria, overdue post-event summaries. One click nudges every owner with a single consolidated email. Items stay visible until they’re resolved, and nobody spends Friday writing chase emails.

Outstanding items12 open
Consulting agreement unsigned
AB-2026-0847 · Owner: submitter
9 days
Speaker CV missing
SP-2026-0311 · Owner: submitter
6 days
Post-event summary due
AB-2026-0792 · Owner: med affairs
3 days
One consolidated email per owner
IntelligenceToday
3
HCPs within 15% of annual cap
100%
Screenings current
2
Risk signals this week
Cross-function engagement overlap
Same HCP, same event, two functions
Review
Year-end spend clustering
4 engagements initiated within cap window
Watch
Exportable in one click

Intelligence

Where am I exposed right now?

Cap proximity, screening status, risk signals, and spend patterns in one view. The question every compliance officer wakes up with gets an answer, not a research project, and the report your leadership asks for generates in a click.

Generated documentation

Documents that draft themselves

Needs assessments, FMV justifications, and engagement briefs generate from the intake itself, ready for human review and edit. Submitters stop staring at blank forms. Reviewers stop reading boilerplate. And every final version lives on the engagement record, next to the agreement, the CV, and the screening result it belongs with.

Needs Assessment FormDraft
Generated from intakeAwaiting review
Attached to AB-2026-0847

And the rest of the platform

Built by someone who does this job

Every artifact in one place

Agreements, CVs, screenings, rate cards, approvals, and post-event records attach to the engagement they belong to. An auditor’s request becomes an export, not a scavenger hunt.

Configured with your program

Rate cards, review gates, and workflow rules are configured to your policies at implementation. The platform enforces your program, not a vendor's template.

Push back without leaving the record

Reviewers approve, reject, or send an engagement back with comments, all inside the system. The full exchange lands in the audit trail, not in an inbox nobody can find later.

MFA. Tenant isolation. Hash-chained audit trail. Standard on every plan.

$46,000,000+

What one drug manufacturer agreed to pay in August 2026 to resolve federal criminal and civil liability for kickback schemes involving healthcare providers. Enforcement doesn’t ask whether your intentions were good. It asks what your records show. The same resolution carried the largest Open Payments reporting penalty in the law's history.

After a settlement, OIG imposes its remedy through a corporate integrity agreement: centralized tracking of every HCP arrangement, documented need and fair market value on each one, and aggregate remuneration monitoring against caps. Verigage pre-builds those controls voluntarily, before anyone requires them.

Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Aug 10, 2026

3
Federal screening sources checked automatically on every HCP submission: OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, FDA debarment
4
Engagement types live today: advisory boards, market research, sponsorships, consulting

Why Verigage

Enterprise incumbents digitized the form. We built the intelligence.

The typical legacy platform moves paper workflows onto a screen. The review still happens in someone’s head.

Typical legacy approach
Verigage
Manual form workflows
AI-assisted review on every submission
FMV lookup outputs a number
FMV determinations carry their methodology, rate card version, and reviewer
Each function manages its own rates
One versioned rate card per HCP feeds every function
Screening as a separate manual step
Federal exclusion screening on intake, automatically
Decisions live in email threads
Hash-chained audit trail, exportable on demand
A new engagement type is a change order
New engagement types deploy on the same backbone, fast

See it with your engagement types

A 30-minute walkthrough using your workflows, your policies, your review process. We bring the compliance questions.

Book a demo

30 minutes. No commitment.